First announced back in March earlier this year, USB4 (previously stylized as USB 4) has today gone official and comes as a major update to the USB 3.2 standard. The new USB4 architecture is based on the Thunderbolt protocol that Intel contributed to USB Promoter Group.
Technical specifications of the USB4 architecture were announced today, revealing that it offers faster data transfer speeds and enhanced compatibility. It’s essentially Thunderbolt 3, which was Intel’s standard and has already appeared on many devices to date, but it’s now carrying a new moniker and is available for all device makers to adopt and use.
In its official press statement, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) has listed out the major upgrades in USB4. These include:
- Faster speeds: This architecture support two-lane operation using the existing USB Type-C cables and up to 40Gbps operation over certified cables. These speeds are 8 times the original USB 3 standard.
- Efficient Display Data Handling: Multiple data and display protocols can efficiently share the maximum aggregate bandwidth over USB4 (important because USB Type-C has evolved as an external display port). This means if your display is utilizing X Gbps bandwidth out of 40Gbps, well, 40-x Gbps will be available for data transfer, power & more.
- Backward compatibility: A newer protocol could make things difficult for users who are using devices with a similar port, but USB4 is backward compatible with USB 3.2, USB 2.0 and Thunderbolt 3.
Well, you already know this one and can see it in the thumbnail above as well. Gone are the days of USB-A connectors which were a pain to connect sometimes. So, USB4 is not introducing a new port but instead, it’s carrying forward the same USB Type-C reversible port. This certainly makes things easier for everyone. There is currently no word on when the first USB4-backed device is coming, but we can expect to see the architecture being adopted by tech giants soon enough.
from Beebom https://beebom.com/usb-4-official-faster-speeds-backward-compatibility/
No comments:
Post a Comment